A BILL IN THE COUNCIL. OF THE DISTRICT OF
COLUMBIA
To amend, on a temporary basis, the District of Columbia Procurement Practices
Act of 1985 to any Year 2000 remediation procurements awarded by the Office of the Chief
Technology Officer; to amend the Fiscal Year 1999 Budget Support Act of 1998 to and to declare the Sense of the
clarify that the Office of Chief Technology Officer has the authority to oversee the
information technology and telecommunications policies, standards, and systems of
independent agencies, board, and commissions;
Council that Congress should amend section 451(d) of the Home Rule Act to exempt Year 2000
remediation contracts from Council review and approval.
BE IT ENACTED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA That this act may be cited as
the "Chief Technology Officer Year 2000 Remediation Procurement Authority Temporary
Amendment Act of 1999".
Sec. 2. Section 320 of the District of Columbia Procurement Practices Act of 1985
(D.C.Law 11-259; D.C. Code §1-1183.20), is amended by adding a new subsection (1) to read
as follows:
"(1) Nothing in this chapter shall affect the authority of the Office of the Chief
Technology Officer to execute contracts for Year 2000 rernediation. For the purpose of
this section, Year 2000 remediation contracts are defined as procurements for the
correction of computers, computer-operated systems. and equipment operated by embedded
computer chips, to ensure the proper recognition and processing of dates on or after
January 1, 2000."
"(n) The Office of the Chief Technology Officer shall not be
exempt from allocating agency contracts to Local, Small. and Disadvantaged Business
Enterprises pursuant to section 7 of the Minority Contracting Act of 1976. effective March
29. 1977 (D.C. Law 1-95; D.C. Code.§1-1146). The Office of the Chief Technology Officer
shall provide monthly reports to the Council beginning 30 days from the effective date of
the Chief Technology Officer Year 2000 Remediation Procurement Authority Emergency
Amendment Act of 1999".
Sec. 2b. Section 105a of the Procurement Practices Act of 1985.
effective April 15. 1997 (D.C. Law 11 -259; Code §1-1181.5a) is amended by adding a new
subsection (e) to read as follows:
"(e) Notwithstanding the provisions of this or any other act, a
Year 2000 remediation contract submitted to the Council by the Mayor shall be deemed
approved at the time a timestamp is affixed to the contract by the Secretary of the
Council, provided a summary of the contract has been filed with the office of the Chairman
of the Council at least4872 hours in advance of the submission
of the contract. The 72-hour period shall not include Saturday. Sunday or a legal holiday.
The contract shall be deemed approved if within the 72-hour period after the receipt or
the summary by the Chairman. a resolution of disapproval has not been signed and
introduced by at least nine members of the Council. If a resolution of disapproval has
been introduced by 9 members within the 72-hour period, the period of Council review shall
be extended by an additional 7 days. If the resolution of disapproval has not been
approved within the 7-day extended period, the contract shall be deemed approved. The
contract summary shall contain: ( 1 ) the name of the proposed contractor and the contract
amount; (2) a description of the goods and services to be provided and the state of work:
and (3) a description of the selection process and the background and qualifications of
the proposed contractor.
Sec 3. Section 1813 of the Fiscal Year 1999 Budget Support Act
of l 1998, signed by the Mayor on June 23, 1998 (D.C. Act 12-399, 45 DCR 7193), is amended
by striking the period at the end of the second sentence and inserting the phrase ",
defined for the purposes of this subtitle as including independent agencies, boards,
commissions, and instrumentalities of the District government." in its place.
Sec. 3b. Section 1814 of the Fiscal Year 1999 Budget Support Act of 1998 is amended
by adding a new paragraph (9) to read as follows:
"(9) Solicit, negotiate, award, and execute Year 2000 remediation contracts,
defined for the purpose of this section as procurements for the correction of computers,
computer-operated systems, and equipment operated by embedded computer chips to ensure the
proper recognition and processing of dates on or after January 1 2000.".
Sec. 4. Sense of the Council.
It is the sense of the Council that the Council review and approval of contracts in
excess of 51 million over a 1 2-month period, as well as Council review and approval of
multi-year contracts mandated by section 451 of the Home Rule Act, adds an unacceptable
delay to Year 2000 remediation contracts, and that Congress should amend section 45 l(d)
of the Home Rule Act to add an exemption from Council review and approval for Year 2000
remediation contracts awarded by the Chief Technology Officer.
Sec. 5. Fiscal impact statement.
The fiscal impact of this legislation shall be positive, because it will facilitate the
effective and efficient resolution of the Year 2000 remediation process, which entails the
correction of computers, computer-operated systems, and equipment operated by embedded
computer chips to ensure the proper recognition and processing of dates on or after
January 1, 2000. The legislation also clarifies the Chief Technology Officer’s authority
to oversee information technology and telecommunications policies in independent agencies,
boards, and commissions, further supporting the execution of a comprehensive Year 2000
remediation process throughout the District government.
The District plans to spend $142.5 million on Year 2000 remediation during fiscal year
1999, and the success of this endeavor is essential to ensure that vital and routine
services such as payroll and personnel processing, emergency response services,
unemployment compensation and social welfare benefits, and motor vehicle services
continue. Year 2000 remediation is also essential to ensure that other functions, such as
elevators, heating systems, telephones, and security systems, that are controlled by
embedded computer chips, continue to work on or after January l . 2000.
If the District cannot execute contracts to procure Year 2000 remediation services on a
timely basis, it will have to pay premium costs as the turn of the century approaches,
resulting in the additional expenditure of millions of dollars. Furthermore, the District
is approximately one year behind in the Year 2000 remediation process, according to
commonly accepted benchmarks, and further delays in the remediation program will cost the
District millions of dollars to restore vital services that will be jeopardized by Year
2000 remediation failures. The Chief Technology Officer has testified that procurement
delays are a chief obstacle to a successful Year 2000 remediation effort. This legislation
will have a strong and positive fiscal impact by facilitating the procurement of
consulting expertise, systems, and equipment needed to support the Year 2000 remediation
program.
Sec. 6. Effective date.
(a) This act shall take effect following approval by the Mayor (or in the event of veto
by the Mayor, action by the Council to override the veto), approval by the Financial
Responsibility and Management Assistance Authority as provided in section 203(a) of the
District of Columbia Financial Responsibility and Management Assistance Act of 1995,
approved April 17, 1995 (109 Stat. 116; D.C. Code §47-392.3(a)) a 30-day period of
Congressional review as provided in section 602(c)(1) of the District of Columbia Home
Rule Act, approved December 24, 1973 (87 Stat. 813; D.C. Code §1-233(c)(1)), and
publication in the District of Columbia Register.
(b) This act shall expire after 225 days of its having taken effect.